The latest picture in the Die Hard franchise has turned into a silly and incredibly trite picture. Continue reading
Taken 2 is the most unnecessary sequel ever made to a terrible thriller. Perhaps the only good thing is… Liam Neeson’s throwing punches. Continue reading
An old group of friends make a movie about an old group friends. That’s basically what Grown Ups is about. Familiar names such as Adam Sandler, Kevin James, Chris Rock and Rob Schneider unfortunately were not able to do this successfully. Lacking intelligent jokes in the first place is not a big issue for a comedy. However Grown Ups even lacks a fair number of successful jokes. They are lame and above all the timing does not work out.
The movie starts with one of those lame flashbacks: a basketball game, five friends and an ambitious coach. Thirty years later the friends have grown apart, obviously, as they lead entirely different lives. The coach has died, how sad – and this serves as a reunion. The ‘fun’ can really start with the 5 stereotypical characters.
You can call Adam Sandler the pure fruit of comedy movies. The comedy genre has turned him into the star he is nowadays. Somehow, though, he has lost his magical touch. The scenario for Grown Ups is down to earth, lazy and not creative at all. This has affected the entire movie, because the only factor that makes a comedy great is the scenario… well, which is in this case a weak one.
The bad timing of the jokes is a huge problem. One can see jokes coming from a mile away. Moreover, these jokes have been poorly executed into the storyline creating only clichés. Perhaps the only good thing in Grown Ups was Steve Buscemi’s epic showdown.
It is unbelievable that such an amazing cast of wonderful and funny actors could have messed this up. I really would not recommend Grown Ups to anyone as it’s purely a waste of time.
Milla Jovovich in a sexy suit. That’s the only plausible reason to go see Resident Evil: Retribution in theaters. Am I right? Well, if you do love awesome CGI combined with an incredibly stupid storyline populated by characters having the potential to be stunning but are not portrayed in such way, there are indeed more reasons to check out Paul W.S. Anderson’s latest production. Just for the sheer fun of it. But I’m warning you: some may even consider ‘checking it out’ as a waste of time, like moi. It’s your choice in the end that counts.
The Resident Evil franchise started off better than expected. Ten years ago, Resident Evil rocked the box office records as it had become extremely popular among teenagers. The movie was based on the successful Capcom game in which it was Alice’s job (Jovovich) to fight against many zombies and horrible looking mutants. In the movies, Alice desires to takedown the Umbrella corporation. This is the evil corporation responsible for the near apocalyptic world Alice is living in.
For the ones who don’t know: what makes Alice special? Simply put, her DNA is able to fight against the T-virus or else we would have gotten zombie Alice.
Resident Evil: Retribution starts directly after the previous movie, RE: Afterlife (2010). Alice and her friends are on the ship (called the Arcadia) and out of nowhere Umbrella forces have arrived in high-tech helicopters to kill them all. Seconds later she wakes up as a housewife in one of those typical suburbs. Obviously, nothing is real. Alice soon realizes she has been captured by Umbrella and has been taken to Umbrella’s secret HQ. From there on she needs to find a way out: she also discovers that in order to break out she must walk through all of Umbrella testing facilities. These are computer simulated cities (like Tokyo or Moscow) terrorized by various plagues, most noticeably the T-virus.
Alice is not alone. She is joined by the Asian beauty Ada Wong, chased by Michelle Rodriguez’ Rain Ocampo and helped by the muscular Luther West. All these characters are fun to include and their contribution to the storyline is essential. Unfortunately, that’s it. They haven’t been given the chance to shine as in some meaningful elaboration into their character psyche (i.e. their underlying purpose in the story). Simple and too safe.
What is noticeable is that the movie starts with a brief recap of the events that had taken place in the previous parts. Although this has been done somewhat differently, Anderson’s method is cheap by all means. It is just copy and pasting the best scenes from previous parts and there you got the first 10 minutes to your movie. Also, I must mention how the scenes taking place in Tokyo are very similar to the scenes we saw in part 4 of the franchise. Of course, someone watching for the first time would not notice this. But I did and it did not feel all right at all.
Anderson’s copy pasting skills go even to greater lengths as he takes scenes from Zack Snyders’ Dawn of the Dead (2004). These scenes include a zombie outbreak in the suburbs of the city.
To be honest with you, I have never understood the logic of the Resident Evil movies until Afterlife came out in 2010. That was just pure action and survival. The CGI was phenomenal in supporting the original action scenes. On the contrary, in Retribution even these kind of scenes are missing. I think Anderson would have done a whole lot better if he’d just written an original story. His lack of ideas makes Resident Evil: Afterlife boring to watch. And I’m not asking much here: no underlying symbolic storyline is needed to make a great success of the movie – this had been already proved by the likable previous parts.