The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (poster)

Directed by Francis Lawrence

Are you familiar with the phrase ‘never judge a book by its movie’? Movies often have the tendency to deviate from the original work because of the inexplainable minds of some Hollywood directors. They wish to explore themes beyond the given source material and elaborate further on the plot and characters. This trend is nothing new, but looking at recent film adaptations there is an obvious risk of messing up the entire production.  Director Thor Freudenthal did it to Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters that is based on the novels by Rick Riordan. Same thing happened this summer to Harald Zwart with the first movie in The Mortal Instruments franchise. It’s good to see that this common mistake has not been made in the second movie in the well-known and highly anticipated The Hunger Games trilogy. Director Francis Lawrence (not in any kind related to JLaw) has managed to take the franchise to a whole new level. Catching Fire is everything a sequel needs to be: more explosiveness, more emotions and an excellent start to a promising two-part finale.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with The Hunger Games, check out my review of the first movie over here. In Catching Fire our heroes, Katniss (Lawrence) and Peeta (Hutcherson), embark on an obligatory ‘Victor’s Tour’ through the dystopian world of Panem. Soon they find themselves in another Hunger Games, even more dangerous than the previous one, with only past victors. Welcome to the Quarter Quell.


Gorgeous as always, Effie Trinket (Elizabeth Banks)

Just like many of you, I was very excited to watch the second part of the trilogy. I even traveled to a town nearby  so I could enjoy the IMAX version and it gladly paid off, even though my expectations were sky high for this one.

After defying the wishes of the Capitol, Katniss becomes the symbol of hope in many districts. She becomes their mockingjay. Her reluctance and inner conflict to accept this position leads to a threat from President Snow (Sutherland) himself. Lawrence beautifully shows us, the audience, how her character is confined in a power struggle between the rich and the poor, between Snow and the People of Panem, in the first half hour of the movie.

Primrose Everdeen: Since the last games, something is different. I can see it.

Katniss Everdeen: What can you see?

Primrose Everdeen: Hope.

 Since there is a huge socio-economic difference between the Capitol and District 12, the director makes good use of that by using an overflow of juxtapositions throughout the story. The vibrant setting of the Capitol is shown against the grim circumstances in other districts. How about for instance a drink that makes you puke so you can taste every dish you want? Those are part of the novel too and that’s what makes the movie even better than part one. By closely sticking to the source material, Catching Fire has resulted into a vibrant and dynamic sequel without the need to become repetitive.

Something new: wide shots of the Capitol.

Something new: wide shots of the Capitol.

The visuals are an essential supporting factor in making all this come true. There are scenes like the Jabberjays/Katniss scene that have elevated the entire outlook of the story onto a battle of the minds. Let me clarify. Part one primarily focused on the dystopian setting, but this part goes to greater lengths. It also adds the psychology behind a character to full details and by doing so it appeals to the audience’s emotions from a new angle.

One of the newcomers is Philip Seymour Hoffman as Plutarch Heavensbee, the new Head Gamemaker. His overall appeal in one-on-one shots with President Snow are one of the best new additions. However, the supporting actor that steals the show is definitely Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickermann. Let’s just say that his presence won’t go unnoticed: he has this energy that humanizes every aspect of the Games and I absolutely love his killer smile.

Something that didn’t bug me in Catching Fire was the removal of the constant shaky shots that director Gary Ross used in the first part. I did however like how those shaky shots were used in the poorer districts as to show how fragile they are, but I was happy with the wide shots. On the contrary, the scene transitions felt unnatural and forced but that didn’t take away the overall effect of the movie. Also, I initially expected some kind of direct interaction between Peeta and Gale (Hemsworth), but I am glad none of it happened because the movie isn’t about love triangles as it sets straight priorities for its main protagonist Katniss. The girl on fire got more important things on her mind.

In the end, Catching Fire is everything for everyone. It’s entertaining on all levels, but remains consciously aware of important themes like hope and belief. Let’s not overhype it though: it’s got a mediocre story. What sets apart this movie is not the story, but the tremendous acting by an excellent cast that will take your breath away in seconds.


IMDb (official button)Watch Trailer (button)


20 thoughts on “The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)

  1. I honestly thought that Catching Fire was so much better than the first one. And you’re totally right on the shaky camera bit!
    Confession: I went through 4 napkins soaked with my tears before the movie ended. But then again, I cry really easily.

    • Haha if you haven’t read the books, the last two movies will be a real shocker. Don’t forget to take enough napkins with you…. I’m telling you…;)
      Yeah, the shaky camera shots were so annoying in the first movie! I’m really glad they abolished those techniques with Catching Fire. It especially gave some kind of calming effect to yet ominous signs throughout the games.

      • AUGHHHH I did read the books and vowed never to touch them again. I actually promised myself I wouldn’t watch the last two movies because I knew what was going to happen. I also think a bit of my crying in this movie has to do with the fact that I know what will happen to certain characters.
        BUT IT WAS SO GOOD! I mean, I don’t want to put myself through the trauma of watching the last one, but at the same time I want to because if it’s anything near as good as how they made Catching Fire, it’d be work it. So conflicted!

  2. I have yet to see this film, but my wife and I are definitely excited over it! We enjoy the whole survivalist strategies employed in the first movie. So we’re hoping Catching Fire will have a bit of that again!

    • It’s all about survival and strategizing. I think you will like Beetee (he is like the genius person in the Games). So you won’t be disappointed!

  3. Nice review. Can’t say I liked it more than the first, but it still did well in getting me locked and loaded for what’s next to come. Let’s just hope they don’t screw it over, because they’re doing so damn well right now.

    • Thanks Dan. The danger does exist of Mockingjay part 1 becoming a total bust so that the second part will stand out (as with any other franchise). But who knows, the Hunger Games franchise may be an exception to this rule.

  4. Agree with other commenters – your review is very good.
    Haven’t read the books, but like you said the material is mediocre; I didn’t love the movie but think it’s an outstanding job of filmmaking. As you pointed out the visual contrast between Capitol and 12 was extremely well delineated. At the time I thought the wide shots were hokey, but they served the storytelling purpose, and at least they werent’ shaky cam!
    My girlfriend dragged me to the first, I dragged myself to the second because of IMAX, I think I’m with you all, I’m looking forward to the next one.

    • Many thanks! What amazed me indeed was how the movie turned out be a rather big enjoyable spectacle while the book and story didn’t create a lot of opportunities for that. I really liked the wide shots and I would gladly see more of those in the next two parts. It somehow reminded me of Star Wars. Thanks for stopping by.

  5. Pingback: Top 10 Favorite Movies of 2013 | Elemental Reviews

Tell me!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s